PresseKat - When is the obligation to compensate under a partnership agreement contrary to common practice?

When is the obligation to compensate under a partnership agreement contrary to common practice?

ID: 972939

To decide whether provisions under a partnership agreement are contrary to common practice, it is necessary to take all the circumstances into account that were relevant when the agreement was signed.

(firmenpresse) - GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and London ? www.grprainer.com/en conclude: In its judgment of June 4, 2013 (File number: II ZR 207.10), the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) ruled that an obligation by a financially incapable partner to repay considerable sums based on the partnership agreement of a private company, which the other partner contributes and which go to the partner?s husband who is acting in the interest of the company, is not contrary to common practice if the wife ? due to her position as a partner ? has an adequate financial interest in promoting the corporate purpose in connection with the payments.

In the opinion of the BGH, to decide whether provisions under a partnership agreement are contrary to common practice, it is necessary to take all the circumstances into account that were relevant when the agreement was signed.

A private company (called GbR or BBG) is the simplest form of partnership. A GbR is an association of individuals consisting of at least two partners who have the same purpose. If nothing else is mentioned in the partnership agreement, all partners are entitled to manage the company jointly. According to the BGH ruling, a GbR is a legally competent partnership and can therefore sue and be sued in court itself.

For a BGB there are few mandatory legal requirements, and it is up to its partners to give the company its form through a partnership agreement. Thus, there is no special form for a partnership agreement, and many GbR rules can be modified. It is precisely this flexibility that is its attraction, but on the other hand, also the danger when such a private company is established.

This applies even more when seen against the legal background that in addition to the company?s assets, the partners of a BGB are liable for all the company?s debts with their own personal property. Even though there is a possibility of internal recourse, an individual partner can initially be held liable by third parties who are creditors of the company.





A lawyer with experience in corporate law provides competent and comprehensive advice, making it possible to use the many different possibilities offered by a GbR to advantage.

A lawyer specializing in corporate law helps in the establishment of a GbR, with the partnership agreement, when there is a change of partners or when a company has to be dissolved.

http://www.grprainer.com/en/BGB-Gesellschaft-GbR.html

Weitere Infos zu dieser Pressemeldung:

Themen in dieser Pressemitteilung:


Unternehmensinformation / Kurzprofil:

Firmenbeschreibung:
GRP Rainer LLP Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater www.grprainer.com ist eine überregionale, wirtschaftsrechtlich ausgerichtete Sozietät. An den Standorten Köln, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, München, Nürnberg, Stuttgart und London berät die Kanzlei insbesondere im gesamten Wirtschaftsrecht, vom Kapitalmarktrecht und Bankrecht bis hin zum Gesellschaftsrecht. Zu den Mandanten gehören Unternehmen aus Industrie und Wirtschaft, Verbände, Freiberufler und Privatpersonen.



Leseranfragen:

Hohenzollernring 21-23, 50672 Köln



PresseKontakt / Agentur:




drucken  als PDF  an Freund senden  Verschwiegenheitspflicht trifft Arbeitnehmer nur bei berechtigtem Interesse ? Arbeitsrecht Wenn es zum Erbfall kommt, gibt es leider häufig Streit über das Erbe
Bereitgestellt von Benutzer: Connektar
Datum: 01.11.2013 - 10:00 Uhr
Sprache: Deutsch
News-ID 972939
Anzahl Zeichen: 2842

Kontakt-Informationen:
Ansprechpartner: Michael Rainer
Stadt:

Köln


Telefon: +49 221 272275-0

Kategorie:

Recht und Verbraucher


Meldungsart:
Anmerkungen:


Diese Pressemitteilung wurde bisher 0 mal aufgerufen.


Die Pressemitteilung mit dem Titel:
"When is the obligation to compensate under a partnership agreement contrary to common practice?"
steht unter der journalistisch-redaktionellen Verantwortung von

GRP Rainer LLP (Nachricht senden)

Beachten Sie bitte die weiteren Informationen zum Haftungsauschluß (gemäß TMG - TeleMedianGesetz) und dem Datenschutz (gemäß der DSGVO).

BGH: Fruchtsaft darf mit "lernstark" werben ...

http://www.grprainer.com/rechtsberatung/gewerblicher-rechtsschutz-und-markenrecht/wettbewerbsrecht.html Angaben wie "lernstark" oder "Mit Eisen zur Unterstützung der Konzentrationsfähigkeit" sind zulässige Angaben auf Leben ...

HCI Shipping Select 26: Möglichkeiten der Anleger ...

http://www.grprainer.com/rechtsberatung/kapitalmarktrecht/faelle/hci-schiffsfonds-und-flottenfonds.html Für die Anleger des Schiffsfonds HCI Shipping Select 26 verlief ihre Beteiligung bisher enttäuschend. Ansprüche auf Schadensersatz können ...

Alle Meldungen von GRP Rainer LLP